Ho Chi Minh City revives stalled property projects

July 25, 2018 | 14:00
(0) user say
Opportunities are opening up for new investors as Ho Chi Minh City has requested that the local authorised agencies take more effective steps in solving long delays in urban development projects.
ho chi minh city revives stalled property projects
New life may soon be breathed into Ho Chi Minh City’s delayed urban development projects , Photo: Le Toan

Last week, the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee assigned its Department of Planning and Investment to propose a plan to bring the Binh Quoi-Thanh Da Urban Area project, delayed more than 14 years, to the public in order to seek new investors.

According to the committee, this is a large-scale project with complicated clarifications, which could result in a lengthy selection period for new investors. In order to minimise the impact of delays, local residents of the urban area will be permitted to prepare and upgrade their houses, which have been degrading for many years.

To further avoid delays, the committee has instructed the local authorised agencies to look for investors with sound financial health.

In their proposal, the local authorised agencies must clarify the legal status and the reason for selecting any new investors. They must also present detailed qualifications of the investors and the selection process through which new investors were chosen. Incoming investors will also be expected to cover expenses for land clearance and compensation, and must have a legal guarantee from prestigious financial institutions.

The Binh Quoi-Thanh Da Urban Area project was awarded to Saigon Construction Company in 2004 as a site of 426 hectares in Binh Thanh district of Ho Chi Minh City. Due to this investor being unable to implement the project by 2010, the committee took it back and gave it to Bitexco, one of the leading multi-sector groups in Vietnam.

In 2015, Dubai’s Emaar Properties joined the project and the two firms planned to develop the $1.42 billion urban area. However, Emaar Properties pulled out of the project in 2017, claiming delays in land clearance and compensation issues as its reasons.

Binh Quoi-Thanh Da is only one of many projects in Ho Chi Minh City listed to be reviewed and for investment permissions to be withdrawn because of years of delays.

Nguyen Thanh Phong, Chairman of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee, has requested the local Department for Natural Resources and the Environment to review plans for 85 real estate projects which have seen years of delays, mostly in Binh Chanh and Nha Be districts.

According to Phong, those projects were only the most prominent cases of a much longer list of 500 projects which have experienced lengthy delays in Ho Chi Minh City.

“Over the last five years, with strict punishment from the local authorities, more than 570 projects were withdrawn, totalling nearly 6,000ha of land,” Phong said at a recent meeting in Ho Chi Minh City to find solutions for delayed projects. “Of these, we have taken some land plots to auction to find new investors.”

The Ho Chi Minh City Department for Natural Resources and the Environment is also assigned to finish its plan to review and propose solutions for all long-delayed projects. The projects delayed for the longest period could be put up for auction in order to mobilise financial resources from other new developers and investors, Phong explained.

Obstacles to site clearance and a lack of investment capital have hindered several large-scale urban development projects in Ho Chi Minh City.

According to Hoang Minh Tri, deputy director of the Ho Chi Minh City Institute for Development Studies, the most difficult problems are to do with land clearance and compensation.

“In many projects, investors cannot negotiate the compensation cost with local households and this causes long delays to the project,” Tri said, adding that there are three main reasons for the lengthy delay of projects in the city. First, developers are not able to secure a good financial source for their planned projects. Second, the projects themselves are not able to attract investors. Third, a lack of information and comprehensive study causes the projects to become unfeasible.

By Bich Ngoc

What the stars mean:

★ Poor ★ ★ Promising ★★★ Good ★★★★ Very good ★★★★★ Exceptional